AMERICAN SNIPER - 2014
Moral choices: Bradley Cooper, right, as sniper Chris Kyle hates wars in general but is enjoying himself too much to quit. Photo: Supplied
Kyle left soon after on the first of four tours of Iraq, as a newly trained Navy SEAL, with an ambition to become a sniper. The book he wrote later makes clear he was gung-ho, full of simple Texas truths and wholesome Christian certainty. Dodging tracers in the helicopter on his first mission makes him fret: "Damn, I thought. We're going to get shot down before I even get a chance to smoke someone."
That line doesn't make it into the movie: it would make him less sympathetic. Even so, there's something dark and bleak about this man. Kyle became the most successful sniper in US military history – with something like 160 "kills". His work supporting advancing troops by hiding on rooftops in Fallujah and killing "hostiles" made him legendary, but Eastwood is interested in the moral dilemmas that such a man faces – even when he has an unshakeable belief in the rightness of what he's doing.
That's why the film begins with an agonising choice: Kyle (Cooper) is on a roof watching through his scope as a woman emerges from a house in front of oncoming Americans, somewhere in Iraq. He watches her hand a rocket grenade to a small boy, who then runs toward the troops. With no supporting vision, his commanders in the rear tell him it's his call. Eastwood then cuts to Texas, and Kyle as a boy (Cole Konis), hunting with his dad. He kills a deer with a clean shot and earns his father's praise. The dilemmas don't get any easier as the film develops, either at home or in the field.
It's like watching a case of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in the making, complicated by the complex psychology of Kyle. He knows he's saving lives by taking them; he hates the enemy enough to find killing them easy. After two tours he hates war in general, but he's enjoying himself too much in this one to quit. Back home with wife and newborn baby, he worries about the men he's not saving.
None of this surprised me. We've seen it before, but Eastwood is good at making it seem raw and personal, largely by the care he takes in building a character, and the situations that will test them. If there is anything that distinguishes his recent movies, it is the room he gives actors to create a character, and the awful moral choices they confront. Bradley Cooper responds to the challenge by making Kyle seem both modest and naive, ruthless and cold-blooded, ambitious and self-effacing, all the while ratcheting up the signs of raging internal tension. He's never as easy with it as he pretends and the self-justifications get harder and harder.
Some have called it a movie glorifying a killer, but I didn't see much glory in Cooper's eyes. Those around Kyle call him "legend" and "hero", and he squirms. What kind of hero shoots women and children from 1000 yards out?
Eastwood started in movies as an actor with a gun and a killer smile, dispatching punks. His most recent films have largely been about the limits and consequences of violence. Not screen violence like in Dirty Harry, but real violence – as in the women's boxing ring, or the vicious old west, or an urban slum blighted by criminal gangs. At 84, he remains as potent a filmmaker as ever, and maybe even more nuanced.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/movies/american-sniper-review-clint-eastwood-creates-a-tense-complex-movie-20150120-12u61w.html#ixzz3Y7QCGT5n
TRAILER